Will the Selloff in China Hurt the Global Economy?

Russ explains why volatility in China's stock market is unlikely to have a material impact on either the global or Chinese economy.

Chinese equities have been in freefall lately. Despite a rebound in recent days after numerous well-intentioned (if somewhat counterproductive) government attempts to break the fall, the Shanghai Composite is down roughly 25 per cent from its peak.

It’s no wonder, then, that many investors are asking: Does the selloff represent a systemic risk to the global economy? My take: Though China is the world’s second largest economy, the volatility in China’s stock market is unlikely to have a material impact on either the global or Chinese economy. Here are six reasons why.

The roller coaster ride in China is mainly a domestic one. Foreign investment accounts for around 1 per cent of Shanghai-listed A-Shares, a market driven by Chinese retail investor sentiment, not fundamentals. Thus, when the A-Shares market moves, it moves sharply and quickly. On the other hand, Hong Kong-listed H-Shares, which more foreigners hold, aren’t as skewed to retail and tend to be less volatile. So, while the H-Shares market didn’t capture as much upside from China’s bull market, it was more insulated on the way down.

The linkage between China’s economy and its stock market isn’t particularly strong. Unlike in the U.S., Chinese companies tend to access capital through bank lending rather than through equity markets, though the Chinese government is trying to encourage greater equity market capitalization via reforms. Indeed, the size of the Chinese stock market relative to China’s gross domestic product (GDP) is fairly small.

Stock weakness doesn’t necessarily lead to economic weakness, and this is true across economies. In fact, stock market weakness generally has less impact on the real economy than real estate weakness. In the U.S., where market cap relative to GDP is much larger than in China, the bursting of the tech bubble in 2000 only resulted in a particularly mild recession.

While Chinese growth is slowing, the pace is measured. While China’s economic growth slowed in the first quarter, it managed to stabilize at 7 per cent in the second quarter. Though most of the damage to the market didn’t occur in the second quarter, thus far, the recent stock market volatility doesn’t seem to be having a noteworthy impact on China’s economic fundamentals.

Chinese officials remain in easing mode. Markets seemed to interpret Chinese government intervention to stem the selloff as coming too early and as a sign of panic from the Chinese authorities. However, some of the government measures—such as encouraging share buybacks—have helped stabilize markets. Looking forward, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has plenty of spare power to support the Chinese economy and financial markets, unlike some developed market central banks, and it will likely continue to implement strong countermeasures. Indeed, any sign of slowing growth in China should be met with further easing policies, so we’re going to see lots of stimulus in various forms to help mitigate the damage from the recent rout.

We haven’t seen much of an impact on the global economy so far. The selloff in China could impact the U.S. via its effect on the dollar, consumer confidence and business confidence. We haven’t seen this. Indeed, despite all the recent drama in China and Greece, the global economy and markets aren’t too far off the trajectory they were on in early 2015.

While global growth for 2015 is, once again, likely to come in below estimates, the recent volatility in China’s equity market is unlikely to exacerbate the slowdown. Growth in Europe continues to firm. In the United States, some improvement in wage growth should help the economy pick up in the back half of the year. The longer-term slowdown in China is likely to continue, but the events of the past few months won’t have a material impact on the trajectory. The bottom line: I still expect slow, but positive global growth for the year.

Source: BlackRock Inc.

Russ Koesterich, CFA, is the Chief Investment Strategist for BlackRock. He is a regular contributor to The Blog and you can find more of his posts here.

This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of July 2015 and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader.

© 2015 BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited.  All rights reserved. iSHARES and BLACKROCK are registered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere.  Used with permission. iSC-1836