For now, bonds are still hedging stocks

Russ takes a look at whether stocks and bonds will move in sync again and what to do if they will.

When stock volatility first erupted in February, something unusual happened: bonds declined along with stocks. This was a clear break from the pattern of the last several years–the post-crisis environment–a period when stocks and bonds have generally moved in opposite directions, a reliably negative correlation.

However, since the spring, the stock-bond correlation has reverted to form (see Chart 1). But as I discussed last year in, The geekiest (and most important) number nobody is discussing, this is not a foregone conclusion. Stocks and bonds sometimes move together. When that happens, investors find that their most reliable hedge suddenly becomes a liability.


The long view

While investors have become accustomed to stocks and bonds mostly moving in the opposite direction, in the 1980s and 1990s stocks and bonds tended to move together. Between 1980 and 2000 stock-bond correlations were positive, averaging about 0.4 (based on a rolling 60-month calculation). But as some investors will remember, that was a very different time.

The ’80s and ’90s more resembled the post-WW II norm of faster growth, both nominal and real (i.e. growth after the rate of inflation). Between 1946 and 2000 real U.S. GDP averaged around 3.6%. Since then it has averaged approximately 2.3%. Nominal GDP has slowed even more, from an average of 7.3% to barely 4%. Much of that change is due to slower inflation. From 1960 to 2000 U.S. core inflation averaged 4%; since then it has averaged just 1.70%.

Given faster growth and more robust inflation, the Federal Reserve was a less benign force in prior periods than it is today. Between 1980 and 2000 the real federal funds rate–calculated as the effective fed funds rate minus the one-year change in the consumer price index–averaged 3.4%, well above today’s barely positive levels.

Slower and steadier

Things changed around the turn of the century, when both growth and inflation slowed. This allowed for structurally easier monetary conditions. In January of 2000 the fed funds rate was 2.75%. Within 18 months it was barely above the rate of inflation. Since 2002 the real fed funds rate has averaged close to -1%. During this same period, the average stock-bond correlation has been approximately -0.10. In more qualitative terms: A less threatening Fed has allowed bonds to play the role of equity hedge.

The price you pay and the hedge you need

The stock-bond correlation impacts portfolios through at least two channels. First, it can affect the rate investors receive on bonds. There is evidence that a bond’s term premium, i.e. the higher interest investors get for holding longer-maturity bonds, moves with stock-bond correlations. Investors are more willing to accept a lower premium for a long-duration bond if they believe that the bond will provide a hedge against equity risk.

Beyond its impact on yield, the stock-bond correlation has an even larger significance. If bonds are a less reliable hedge, investors looking to mitigate portfolio risk need to maintain a much larger cash balance or find another hedge.

Nonetheless, monetary conditions are still easy and concerns over growth exist. This suggest bonds can still perform one key function: a hedge.

Russ Koesterich, CFA, is Portfolio Manager for BlackRock’s Global Allocation team and is a regular contributor to The Blog.

Investing involves risks, including possible loss of principal.

This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of October 2018 and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index.

©2018 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. BLACKROCK is a registered trademark of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.