2017 winners make peculiar bedfellows

Russ explores why both risky assets and traditional safe havens have performed well this year, and whether that can continue.

Thus far, 2017 has been notable for solid gains, not intellectual consistency. For various reasons, investors have demonstrated a marked preference to “barbell” their risk. Year-to-date performance suggests a preference for either very risky or very safe assets.

The year’s top performers include emerging market (EM) equities, industrial metals and the tech heavy NASDAQ, all traditional “risk-on” assets. However, defensive assets are also performing surprisingly well. See the chart below. Gold has outperformed most developed equity markets, the Japanese yen has rallied and long-dated (20+ year) Treasuries are up over 10%.

Year-to-date asset performance

asset-performance-v2

Nor is this pattern limited to asset class performance. It is also evident one level down, in the performance of equity sectors and styles. High beta segments of the equity market, such as biotech and semiconductors, have posted 20% or better gains. At the same time, minimum volatility strategies have been competitive and health care and utilities, traditional defensive sectors, are the second and third best performing sectors year-to-date. What explains the paradox of risky assets and safe havens rallying together?

1. Factors in favor

This year has been about growth and momentum, both beneficiaries of the slow but stable economic regime. The unraveling of the “Trump trade” has pushed investors back into those growth names, primarily tech, that can generate organic growth. A slow but steady economy also means low economic and market volatility. This phenomenon has supported momentum. In other words, the combination of slow growth and low volatility has favored segments of the market associated with a preference for risk, when in fact what investors really want are companies that can thrive in a slow growth world.

2. Benefits of a weak U.S. dollar

Gains in the best performing asset classes can be explained by one of the weakest: the dollar. The rally in gold and emerging markets reverses the trend witnessed in late 2016, when a strong dollar led to underperformance for both asset classes. But as expectations of higher interest rates have fallen and the dollar has given back all of its recent gains, EM and gold have come roaring back.

3. Commodity supply

While industrial metals and gold are having a stellar year, the gains in some commodities do not extend to the overall asset class. Oil is the most notable laggard; robust global supply has translated into stubbornly high inventories. Similar supply issues have bedeviled other parts of the commodity complex, particularly agricultural commodities.

Going forward, apart from the idiosyncratic issues facing select commodities, the big things to watch are growth and central banks. For the current trend to continue, you need three somewhat related conditions: modest growth and inflation, low volatility and skittish central bankers. I say related because to the extent we continue to see the former, unresponsive inflation, we’re more likely to get the latter, nervous central bankers who are unwilling to withdraw accommodation. Under this scenario, the combination of “just enough” growth, macro stability and low rates may continue to make for strange bedfellows.

Russ Koesterich, CFA, is Portfolio Manager for BlackRock’s Global Allocation team and is a regular contributor to The Blog.

Investing involves risks, including possible loss of principal. Investments in natural resources can be significantly affected by events in the commodities markets.

This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of September 2017 and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any forecasts made will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index.

©2017 BlackRock, Inc. All rights reserved. BLACKROCK is a registered trademark of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. All other marks are the property of their respective owners.

257109

Join the Conversation

How do you feel about this paradox? How do you feel about this paradox? Join in >