Blaming the weather seems like a weak excuse for poor performance. Yet, that is what many economists have been doing lately, as they try to explain a slew of weaker–than–expected reports about the U.S. economy.U.S. economic data has been coming in soft since the start of the year, and a measure of how well economic data is performing relative to forecasts recently hit its lowest level since last summer. Most economists seem to be attributing the soft patch to the lingering effects of the Polar Vortex, a weather pattern responsible for frigid temperatures and unusually heavy snow throughout much of the United States.Many investors trying to gauge the state of the economy, however, are wondering: How much of the blame really lies with the weather? My take: While the weather is certainly responsible for some, or perhaps even most, of the recent slowdown, it’s not the whole story.There is little doubt that brutally cold temperatures and snowstorms are impacting the economy, particularly manufacturing and housing–related activity. Common sense suggests that certain activities – particularly anything done outside – are simply harder to do when dealing with sub–zero temperatures and shoulder–high snowdrifts.In fact, much of the recent softness in manufacturing and industrial production appears weather related. For example, the ISM New Orders Index plunged by approximately 12 points in January. The only other time in recent memory that this indicator fell that much was in October of 2001. Given that there has been no exogenous shock recently on par with 9/11, it seems that weather is having some impact, a conclusion reinforced by January’s sharp drops in industrial production and capacity utilization.However, it’s a mistake to blame every recent weak economic print on the weather. While December’s weak jobs report can be partially blamed on the cold, January’s report looked less impacted by outside factors. It’s telling that the one segment of the labor market that did record a meaningful increase in January was construction, an industry that by its nature has to be done outside. In a similar vein, January’s softness in retail spending appears more a function of anemic income growth than icy pavements; a view reinforced by the hit online sales took in January.The bottom line: There are other reasons for the weak economic data beyond just the weather, including a still soft labor market and anemic real wage growth. Both of these factors are having a predictable impact on consumers, who got through 2013 largely on the back of a wealth effect and a declining savings rate.That said, for now the Fed appears to be unmoved by the spate of soft data. All available evidence indicates that the Fed still believes the economy has enough momentum to justify tapering. Apparently, it will take more than a cold winter to deter the Fed from exiting quantitative easing later this year. Still, the Fed’s outlook may change if the recent weakness continues into the spring. Russ Koesterich, CFA, is the Chief Investment Strategist for BlackRock and iShares Chief Global Investment Strategist. He is a regular contributor to The Blog and you can find more of his posts here. Source: Bloomberg, BlackRock Research
How much is the weather to blame for recent soft U.S. economic data? While the weather is certainly responsible for some, or perhaps even most, of the recent slowdown, it’s not the whole story, writes Russ.