A defining characteristic of minimum volatility (or min vol) portfolios is that they seek to help smooth out the market’s peaks and valleys by holding low beta stocks — stocks that don’t typically exhibit excessive amounts of volatility compared with the broader market.
After I explain this to clients, I inevitably get asked this question: “How does this low-beta effect behave over time?”
It’s a fair question. Unlike a typical cap-weighted benchmark or other well-known “market effects” such as value and momentum, there are no “live” indices or funds to look at for a quick answer. We can, however, get a flavor for the behavior of the low-beta effect with a simple experiment.
As I’ve explained in previous blog posts, a min vol portfolio tends to overweight low beta securities compared with a typical cap-weighted portfolio. So, let’s look at how low-beta stocks have performed over time.
To conduct this simple experiment, I looked at the stocks in the S&P 500 index and calculated their betas to the market every month since 1959. Why 1959? That is the first full year of the S&P 500 index, making the return of each of these stocks straightforward to collect and easy to compare with the overall return of the market. In addition, I broke out the time periods 1980-2011 and 2001-2011 to get a view of more recent periods in the data.
*Risk is defined as the standard deviation of excess returns. The data in the table is annualized from monthly returns.
Keep in mind that this experiment did not benefit from the full process of actually constructing a min vol portfolio. But it was able to demonstrate that over the 52-year period, low-beta stocks performed better than the overall market when it came to their level of return per unit of risk. (Remember that this was over a period when the market was up, on average, about 5.2% over the risk-free rate.)
It also helps to demonstrate why investors can view min vol as a core, long-term holding, rather than seeing it solely as a means of “downside protection” when overall markets are performing poorly.